Comments on: Weepy in New Hampshire http://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/ Conservative Politics, Religion, Culture, and Anything Else Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:02:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mikehttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2469 Mike Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:34:40 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2469 Well, she "hardly handled" the New Hampshire primary, but she handled it. Where does her broom touch down next?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2469','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2469','Mike','Well, she \"hardly handled\" the New Hampshire primary, but she handled it. Where does her broom touch down next?'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Well, she “hardly handled” the New Hampshire primary, but she handled it. Where does her broom touch down next?
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Chrishttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2464 Chris Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:48:37 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2464 Building on Ryan's point of what made SWMNBN "cry," it's just another example of how the Clintons are in it for themselves. Romney cried out of happiness when discrimination ended in his church...nothing wrong there; George W. Bush cried with families who lost their loved ones in Iraq...nothing wrong there with mourning a family's loss...George HW Bush cried at Ronald Reagan's funeral...mourning the loss of the greatest President the US has seen in the 20th century who was responsible for his victory in 1988. To sum it up, there was a bigger issue at hand that triggered the emotions...but SWMNBN??? Herself. Loathing in self-pity, she continues to play the victim card that she has done so well over the years whether as had been done in her marriage, her 2000 Senatorial Campaign and her public life. Apparently, her husband has the same self-centered narcissistic practices. In a recent speech the Impeached One was supposed to be making for his wife, he used the word "I" 49 times! No surprise there.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2464','Chris'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2464','Chris','Building on Ryan\'s point of what made SWMNBN \"cry,\" it\'s just another example of how the Clintons are in it for themselves. Romney cried out of happiness when discrimination ended in his church...nothing wrong there; George W. Bush cried with families who lost their loved ones in Iraq...nothing wrong there with mourning a family\'s loss...George HW Bush cried at Ronald Reagan\'s funeral...mourning the loss of the greatest President the US has seen in the 20th century who was responsible for his victory in 1988. To sum it up, there was a bigger issue at hand that triggered the emotions...but SWMNBN??? Herself. Loathing in self-pity, she continues to play the victim card that she has done so well over the years whether as had been done in her marriage, her 2000 Senatorial Campaign and her public life. Apparently, her husband has the same self-centered narcissistic practices. In a recent speech the Impeached One was supposed to be making for his wife, he used the word \"I\" 49 times! No surprise there.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Building on Ryan’s point of what made SWMNBN “cry,” it’s just another example of how the Clintons are in it for themselves. Romney cried out of happiness when discrimination ended in his church…nothing wrong there; George W. Bush cried with families who lost their loved ones in Iraq…nothing wrong there with mourning a family’s loss…George HW Bush cried at Ronald Reagan’s funeral…mourning the loss of the greatest President the US has seen in the 20th century who was responsible for his victory in 1988. To sum it up, there was a bigger issue at hand that triggered the emotions…but SWMNBN??? Herself. Loathing in self-pity, she continues to play the victim card that she has done so well over the years whether as had been done in her marriage, her 2000 Senatorial Campaign and her public life. Apparently, her husband has the same self-centered narcissistic practices. In a recent speech the Impeached One was supposed to be making for his wife, he used the word “I” 49 times! No surprise there.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Ryanhttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2465 Ryan Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:28:48 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2465 She Who Must Not Be Named's psycho-drama continues.Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that the almost-tears were almost real. What evoked them? Not talk of health care, the war or policy issues, or a question about her family. Rather, "how do you keep so upbeat and wonderful?" Maybe she doesn't get any real emotional support from people in her life. Maybe people close to her are just as callous as she is and that occasionally a semblance of emotion comes out, even when evoked from a stranger in a public forum, the day before a huge primary......or maybe not.That whole family needs a good therapist, not a seat in the Oval Office. I still think that the tears were contrived and part of the political gamesmanship of what Mike mentioned as showing her "human side" to the public.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2465','Ryan'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2465','Ryan','She Who Must Not Be Named\'s psycho-drama continues.\n\nLet\'s just say, for the sake of argument, that the almost-tears were almost real. What evoked them? Not talk of health care, the war or policy issues, or a question about her family. Rather, \"how do you keep so upbeat and wonderful?\" Maybe she doesn\'t get any real emotional support from people in her life. Maybe people close to her are just as callous as she is and that occasionally a semblance of emotion comes out, even when evoked from a stranger in a public forum, the day before a huge primary...\n\n...or maybe not.\n\nThat whole family needs a good therapist, not a seat in the Oval Office. I still think that the tears were contrived and part of the political gamesmanship of what Mike mentioned as showing her \"human side\" to the public.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> She Who Must Not Be Named’s psycho-drama continues.

Let’s just say, for the sake of argument, that the almost-tears were almost real. What evoked them? Not talk of health care, the war or policy issues, or a question about her family. Rather, “how do you keep so upbeat and wonderful?” Maybe she doesn’t get any real emotional support from people in her life. Maybe people close to her are just as callous as she is and that occasionally a semblance of emotion comes out, even when evoked from a stranger in a public forum, the day before a huge primary…

…or maybe not.

That whole family needs a good therapist, not a seat in the Oval Office. I still think that the tears were contrived and part of the political gamesmanship of what Mike mentioned as showing her “human side” to the public.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Mikehttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2466 Mike Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:10:17 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2466 She Who Must Not Be Named is a total fraud. The only emotion we have ever seen from this witch since the early 1980s is anger. Throughout the campaign, she has been encouraged to show her human side. Proving this task to be impossible, she has now resorted to crocodile tears. It is simply pathetic.There is a slight possibility that I'm misreading this of course (maybe about a one percent chance), but if I am wrong than today's tears are an even poorer reflection on her than I think. If these tears were real, then she has just proven that after thirty five years of dishing it out to those who oppose her, she is simply unable to take it.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2466','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2466','Mike','She Who Must Not Be Named is a total fraud. The only emotion we have ever seen from this witch since the early 1980s is anger. Throughout the campaign, she has been encouraged to show her human side. Proving this task to be impossible, she has now resorted to crocodile tears. It is simply pathetic.\n\nThere is a slight possibility that I\'m misreading this of course (maybe about a one percent chance), but if I am wrong than today\'s tears are an even poorer reflection on her than I think. If these tears were real, then she has just proven that after thirty five years of dishing it out to those who oppose her, she is simply unable to take it.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> She Who Must Not Be Named is a total fraud. The only emotion we have ever seen from this witch since the early 1980s is anger. Throughout the campaign, she has been encouraged to show her human side. Proving this task to be impossible, she has now resorted to crocodile tears. It is simply pathetic.

There is a slight possibility that I’m misreading this of course (maybe about a one percent chance), but if I am wrong than today’s tears are an even poorer reflection on her than I think. If these tears were real, then she has just proven that after thirty five years of dishing it out to those who oppose her, she is simply unable to take it.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Chrishttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2468 Chris Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:10:20 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2468 Liberals playing the victim card...nothing new in that.But remember...our enemies are watching this.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2468','Chris'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2468','Chris','Liberals playing the victim card...nothing new in that.\n\nBut remember...our enemies are watching this.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Liberals playing the victim card…nothing new in that.

But remember…our enemies are watching this.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Webloggin - Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton Crying Episode Update - Still Waiting for the Dust to Settle AND Congrats to the Anchoress for Predicting Hillary Tears a Week in Advance of Actual Eventhttp://axisofright.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2467 Webloggin - Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton Crying Episode Update - Still Waiting for the Dust to Settle AND Congrats to the Anchoress for Predicting Hillary Tears a Week in Advance of Actual Event Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:34 +0000 http://axisofright.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/weepy-in-new-hampshire/#comment-2467 [...] | Political Vindication, Bent Notes » Blog Archive » The connection, Blogs of War, Weepy in New Hampshire « Axis of Right, The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » There’s a lifeboat waiting for Hillary, [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2467','Webloggin - Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton Crying Episode Update - Still Waiting for the Dust to Settle AND Congrats to the Anchoress for Predicting Hillary Tears a Week in Advance of Actual Event'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2467','Webloggin - Blog Archive » Hillary Clinton Crying Episode Update - Still Waiting for the Dust to Settle AND Congrats to the Anchoress for Predicting Hillary Tears a Week in Advance of Actual Event','[...] | Political Vindication, Bent Notes » Blog Archive » The connection, Blogs of War, Weepy in New Hampshire « Axis of Right, The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » There’s a lifeboat waiting for Hillary, [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] | Political Vindication, Bent Notes » Blog Archive » The connection, Blogs of War, Weepy in New Hampshire « Axis of Right, The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » There’s a lifeboat waiting for Hillary, [...]
Reply – Quote
]]>