Comments on: Repealing the Bailout http://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/ Conservative Politics, Religion, Culture, and Anything Else Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:02:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Terryhttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-11760 Terry Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:35:26 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-11760 Senate totaly screwed up with TARP and had the balls to tack on an extra 100 billion+ in pork. Yeah you need to repeal it.JP Morgan said today he never wanted the 25 billion paulson gave him. but thought it was his patriotic duty to take it, lol.Ask him for it back..give it to the Auto dudes where it will actualy keep the economy from imploding. Senate is Screwing up again this time by not bailing out main street. Gave over 7 trillion to the banks ..world banks. 2 trillion on a undeclared war they can't win..fightin cochroaches. Now all of a sudden they are worried about 14 billion and going against the constitution..give me a break. This auto thing is all about keeping wages low.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('11760','Terry'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('11760','Terry','Senate totaly screwed up with TARP and had the balls to tack on an extra 100 billion+ in pork. Yeah you need to repeal it. \r\n\r\nJP Morgan said today he never wanted the 25 billion paulson gave him. but thought it was his patriotic duty to take it, lol.\r\n\r\nAsk him for it back..give it to the Auto dudes where it will actualy keep the economy from imploding. Senate is Screwing up again this time by not bailing out main street. Gave over 7 trillion to the banks ..world banks. 2 trillion on a undeclared war they can\'t win..fightin cochroaches. Now all of a sudden they are worried about 14 billion and going against the constitution..give me a break. This auto thing is all about keeping wages low.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Senate totaly screwed up with TARP and had the balls to tack on an extra 100 billion+ in pork. Yeah you need to repeal it.

JP Morgan said today he never wanted the 25 billion paulson gave him. but thought it was his patriotic duty to take it, lol.

Ask him for it back..give it to the Auto dudes where it will actualy keep the economy from imploding. Senate is Screwing up again this time by not bailing out main street. Gave over 7 trillion to the banks ..world banks. 2 trillion on a undeclared war they can’t win..fightin cochroaches. Now all of a sudden they are worried about 14 billion and going against the constitution..give me a break. This auto thing is all about keeping wages low.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Jasonhttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-9577 Jason Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:14:27 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-9577 When the bill was enacted a Congressional Oversight Panel was created to review the state of the markets, current regulatory system, and the Treasury Department's management of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.So what is really the problem?http://nomedals.blogspot.com<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9577','Jason'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9577','Jason','When the bill was enacted a Congressional Oversight Panel was created to review the state of the markets, current regulatory system, and the Treasury Department\'s management of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.\r\n\r\nSo what is really the problem?\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/nomedals.blogspot.com'); return false;">Quote</a></div> When the bill was enacted a Congressional Oversight Panel was created to review the state of the markets, current regulatory system, and the Treasury Department’s management of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

So what is really the problem?

http://nomedals.blogspot.com

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Scroll For Updates: United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger: Screw You If You Think Our Memebers Are Giving More Concessions | Right Voiceshttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-9530 Scroll For Updates: United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger: Screw You If You Think Our Memebers Are Giving More Concessions | Right Voices Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:52:05 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-9530 [...] Repealing the Bailout | Axis of Right [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9530','Scroll For Updates: United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger: Screw You If You Think Our Memebers Are Giving More Concessions | Right Voices'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9530','Scroll For Updates: United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger: Screw You If You Think Our Memebers Are Giving More Concessions | Right Voices','[...] Repealing the Bailout | Axis of Right [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] Repealing the Bailout | Axis of Right [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Mikehttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-9528 Mike Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:30:35 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-9528 True, but we shouldn't call the same plan. The reason why so many people are outraged over this now but not before is because it isn't the same plan.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9528','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9528','Mike','True, but we shouldn\'t call the same plan. The reason why so many people are outraged over this now but not before is because it isn\'t the same plan.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> True, but we shouldn’t call the same plan. The reason why so many people are outraged over this now but not before is because it isn’t the same plan.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Salhttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-9526 Sal Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:23:35 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-9526 <blockquote><a href='#comment-9524' rel="nofollow">Originally Posted By Mike</a><br/>One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.</blockquote>While that is certainly true, it was also irresponsible of the legislators who sponsored this, primarily because the bill itself gave such a broad range of powers to the Secretary of the Treasury. The legislation was not specific in how the money would be used. The plan that was touted in the press and by the administration was not spelled out in the legislation. So, although some of the original supporters of the bill may have acted in good faith, it was still irresponsible of them not to insist on more tightly controlled language in the legislation.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9526','Sal'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9526','Sal','<blockquote><a href=\'#comment-9524\' rel=\"nofollow\">Originally Posted By Mike<\/a><br\/>One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.<\/blockquote>\r\n\r\nWhile that is certainly true, it was also irresponsible of the legislators who sponsored this, primarily because the bill itself gave such a broad range of powers to the Secretary of the Treasury. The legislation was not specific in how the money would be used. The plan that was touted in the press and by the administration was not spelled out in the legislation. So, although some of the original supporters of the bill may have acted in good faith, it was still irresponsible of them not to insist on more tightly controlled language in the legislation.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>

Originally Posted By Mike
One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.

While that is certainly true, it was also irresponsible of the legislators who sponsored this, primarily because the bill itself gave such a broad range of powers to the Secretary of the Treasury. The legislation was not specific in how the money would be used. The plan that was touted in the press and by the administration was not spelled out in the legislation. So, although some of the original supporters of the bill may have acted in good faith, it was still irresponsible of them not to insist on more tightly controlled language in the legislation.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Mikehttp://axisofright.com/2008/11/17/repealing-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-9524 Mike Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:05:15 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=3826#comment-9524 One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9524','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9524','Mike','One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> One thing in defense of the original pro-bailout people (of which I am not), this is a different plan than the first one. They probably should have foreseen such a significant change in it, but it is a different plan.
Reply – Quote
]]>