Climate Change Hoax

by Sal on January 5, 2009

in Media Bias,Politics

I never thought I’d link favorably to a post on the Huffington Post, but today I found one worthy of praise, written by Harold Ambler and entitled “Mr Gore: Apology Accepted.“  Ambler is a self-identified liberal and Obama-voter, yet he points out how global climate change (formerly man-made global warming) is a complete hoax, and in fact the biggest con ever pulled on the entire human population.

In the article, Ambler points out how the data used by Al Gore and other “scientists” in the matter is wrong, and also how Climate has always changed, including how the Earth has indeed experienced climates a great deal warmer than our current one in the last millennia.

First, the expression “climate change” itself is a redundancy, and contains a lie. Climate has always changed, and always will. There has been no stable period of climate during the Holocene, our own climatic era, which began with the end of the last ice age 12,000 years ago. During the Holocene there have been numerous sub-periods with dramatically varied climate, such as the warm Holocene Optimum (7,000 B.C. to 3,000 B.C., during which humanity began to flourish, and advance technologically), the warm Roman Optimum (200 B.C. to 400 A.D., a time of abundant crops that promoted the empire), the cold Dark Ages (400 A.D. to 900 A.D., during which the Nile River froze, major cities were abandoned, the Roman Empire fell apart, and pestilence and famine were widespread), the Medieval Warm Period (900 A.D. to 1300 A.D., during which agriculture flourished, wealth increased, and dozens of lavish examples of Gothic architecture were created), the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850, during much of which plague, crop failures, witch burnings, food riots — and even revolutions, including the French Revolution — were the rule of thumb), followed by our own time of relative warmth (1850 to present, during which population has increased, technology and medical advances have been astonishing, and agriculture has flourished).

The hoax of Climate Change has been co-opted by the media and the United Nations.  New evidence that we are actually entering a cooling trend is changing the minds of many scientists throughout the world, but their research and thought is being stifled by the press, by the  United Nations, and by politicians.

Ambler points out, rightly, that Al Gore’s reference to global-warming skeptics as “flat-earthers” is wrong.  I contend that in some ways it is apt.  The idea that most medieval scholars believed in a flat earth has been somewhat debunked.  The idea of the spherical Earth was prevalent in the Middle Ages.  The real comparison to today’s global warming debate is  the debate in the middle ages of the place of the Earth in the Universe.  It was the “consensus” of scientists in the Middle Ages and early Renaissance that the Earth was the center of the universe.  The view was also held by the prevailing governments of the time, backed by a mistaken view that the Earth as center of the universe was Christian doctrine.  It was these few scientists, Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and others, went against the prevailing politics and scientific “consensus” based on new evidence.  As history has shown us, these scientists were persecuted for it.

We are doing the same thing again today.  Whatever one’s view on global warming, the fact that so many scientists have come up with such divergent data (a great many for the idea of man-made Climate Change ruining the earth and an equal number or greater number debunking the theory) should give one pause to at least consider the fact that it is not scientific consensus just becase Al Gore, Kofi Annan, and a few other politicians, scientists, and media talking-heads have declared it so.  Welcome to the new Inquisition.  This time, it’s the religion of the environmentalists is king, and anyone who does not adhere to it will be declared a heretic.

{ 5 trackbacks }

Ethics and Climate Change Blogs « Dot Alpine Blog
January 16, 2009 at 4:31 pm
The Tax Increase of Cap and Trade | Axis of Right
March 11, 2009 at 8:15 am
Explosive Expressions
September 22, 2009 at 11:03 am
climate change hoax | The Most Popular People Interests
November 24, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Unhappy About the Demise of the Incandescent Light Bulb? Drink Beer! | Axis of Right
February 19, 2011 at 1:21 pm

{ 55 comments… read them below or add one }

Sal December 29, 2009 at 7:49 pm

@NotSure -

All of the data that most scientists base their conclusions on in the arena of global warming comes from three sources. We now know definatively that at least one of those sources rigged their data. A large number of climatologists do indeed question Climate Change. It is only the vocal supporters of climate change that are given airplay by the media, and some of them are indeed corrupt as they intentionally modified data in order to fit their pre-determined hypothesis.


NotSure January 3, 2010 at 12:58 am

@Sal – Thank you for the reply. Could you give me some sources for your info? Thx


LickDaCat January 10, 2010 at 12:11 am

The powers behind the entire global warming scam are the Bilderberg Group. They are more powerful than any government as they control the central banks of nearly every country on earth. Through bribery they control the governments of all but a few nations. They devised the carbon taxes decades ago to enslave the population and create a single world dictatorship. The have all the money they could ever need, what they want is power, the power to change the world into their own personal paradise. They want to reduce the population of the entire planet to well below 500 million. They plan to keep their slaves in selected metropolitan areas where they can be controlled and used to produce the needs of the elite. The elite will be the only ones with reproductive freedom and use of the planet outside of the designated areas for the slaves.

If scientists want to continue working or to even keep breathing they must go along with the scam and do what they are told by the evil elitist scumbags. Bio-weapons and vaccines will be used to cull the masses to desired levels. The media is owned/controlled these scumbags, so the sleeping idiots will never know what is happening until it is too late, they will have already taken the poison vaccines or have been sprayed by the chem-trails. If we could actually gain control of our government from them we could kill them all at the next Bilderberg meeting with a single high powered bomb, then track down all of their relatives and convict them of treason. These scumbags are the true terrorists, they actually are responsible for the attacks on 9/11, the USS Liberty and many other false flag events. Our true enemy Israel is directly tied to most of the Bilderberg members. Israel bribes our congress with over $300 million every year, this does not include the numbered foreign bank accounts, cash and gifts.

Many people think because they have a few million that they are included in the elite. This is a deadly mistake for them, this group will only have about 1000 members. The elite will not have a need for useless chair warmers demanding huge salaries. One good thing to come from this is that welfare queens and their criminal spawn will no longer exist as there will be no need for useless eaters anymore. No longer will we have elections, so ACORN won’t need to register the same voter under numerous names to steal elections.

Originally Posted By NotSureJust so we’re clear, we’re really accusing a worldwide coalition of scientists of deliberate deception for financial gain/political pull?

To all the scientists who have posted here, I ask: would YOU openly support a claim in your field that you KNEW to be false? If not, do you believe a lot of your colleagues would? What would it take to get 99% of the people in your field to agree publicly on something they knew to be not only false, but also dangerous and politically motivated? Perhaps all the scientists are being tricked by someone way smarter or more powerful than all of them. I don’t know. I’m not a scientist, I’m a teacher.

I ask because accusing a global scientific community of conspiracy and intentional malfeasance is pretty big potatoes – I’m not sure that it’s ever happened in the history of mankind! (Galileo is not a parallel to this situation – that was a victory of science over faith.)

I also fail to see how any politicians would gain in the long run by my reducing consumption, i.e. buying less.


Georgia December 11, 2010 at 3:03 am

I think that some of your facts are wrong. I agree that the climate has always been changing, but “climate change” is a change in the climate that man has made. For instance, the climate getting hotter is normal, but we are speeding it up. If you go to Antarctica (which you should), learn science (and see how much you got wrong) and conduct the experiments yourself. Do as much reasearch as you want, but all I can see is the solution of climate change.


Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: