Comments on: The Federalism Amendments http://axisofright.com/2009/10/22/the-federalism-amendments/ Conservative Politics, Religion, Culture, and Anything Else Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:02:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tennessee is not an actual state, and is actually a wing of the Republican Party - Political Forumhttp://axisofright.com/2009/10/22/the-federalism-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-48934 Tennessee is not an actual state, and is actually a wing of the Republican Party - Political Forum Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:45:55 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=7506#comment-48934 [...] Judges to interpret the Constitution based on the original meaning at the time it was written. Axis of Right The Bill of Federalism Project is a non-profit corporation. Our mission is to educate state [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('48934','Tennessee is not an actual state, and is actually a wing of the Republican Party - Political Forum'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('48934','Tennessee is not an actual state, and is actually a wing of the Republican Party - Political Forum','[...] Judges to interpret the Constitution based on the original meaning at the time it was written. Axis of Right The Bill of Federalism Project is a non-profit corporation. Our mission is to educate state [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] Judges to interpret the Constitution based on the original meaning at the time it was written. Axis of Right The Bill of Federalism Project is a non-profit corporation. Our mission is to educate state [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Chuckhttp://axisofright.com/2009/10/22/the-federalism-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-48931 Chuck Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:42:34 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=7506#comment-48931 Sorry, I forgot to include "due process of law" as a method to take away rights of the individual should they not freely consent.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('48931','Chuck'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('48931','Chuck','Sorry, I forgot to include \"due process of law\" as a method to take away rights of the individual should they not freely consent.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Sorry, I forgot to include “due process of law” as a method to take away rights of the individual should they not freely consent.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Chuckhttp://axisofright.com/2009/10/22/the-federalism-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-48927 Chuck Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:29:30 +0000 http://axisofright.com/?p=7506#comment-48927 Great proposals, except "9. Expanding the rights of the people." The statement assumes the rights are granted by government and are limited. It couldn't be more wrong. What we consider "rights" are bestowed upon us by the Creator, which is clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence as well as the arguments found in the Federalist Papers supporting the US Constitution. Our rights are God given and cannot be taken away with out consent of the individual. The Bill of Rights were included in the Constitution merely as a list of very precious rights for which the federal government was charged with the duty of protecting - not lending to the people. The amount of rights of the individual are essentially endless as the power structure was inteded to be - GOD > individuals > local > state > federal. We cannot allow public perception to wrongly associate the government as the source of our rights or they truly will be taken from us.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('48927','Chuck'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('48927','Chuck','Great proposals, except \"9. Expanding the rights of the people.\" The statement assumes the rights are granted by government and are limited. It couldn\'t be more wrong. What we consider \"rights\" are bestowed upon us by the Creator, which is clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence as well as the arguments found in the Federalist Papers supporting the US Constitution. Our rights are God given and cannot be taken away with out consent of the individual. The Bill of Rights were included in the Constitution merely as a list of very precious rights for which the federal government was charged with the duty of protecting - not lending to the people. The amount of rights of the individual are essentially endless as the power structure was inteded to be - GOD > individuals > local > state > federal. We cannot allow public perception to wrongly associate the government as the source of our rights or they truly will be taken from us.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Great proposals, except “9. Expanding the rights of the people.” The statement assumes the rights are granted by government and are limited. It couldn’t be more wrong. What we consider “rights” are bestowed upon us by the Creator, which is clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence as well as the arguments found in the Federalist Papers supporting the US Constitution. Our rights are God given and cannot be taken away with out consent of the individual. The Bill of Rights were included in the Constitution merely as a list of very precious rights for which the federal government was charged with the duty of protecting – not lending to the people. The amount of rights of the individual are essentially endless as the power structure was inteded to be – GOD > individuals > local > state > federal. We cannot allow public perception to wrongly associate the government as the source of our rights or they truly will be taken from us.
Reply – Quote
]]>