Seventy-one year old actor Morgan Freeman was involved in a one-car accident late last night in Mississippi. He was airlifted to a nearby hospital and is in “serious condition” with injuries to his shoulder and arm.
In his latest work, Freeman plays Lucius in the blockbuster sequel The Dark Knight. He’s a major film icon, being in such films as Million Dollar Baby, Shawshank Redemption, Driving Miss Daisy, Deep Impact, Glory, Amistad, Batman Begins, Along Came a Spider, Lean on Me and numerous others. His politics is typical of Hollywood, as he has endorsed “The One” Barack Obama, but again, politics stops in instances like this. We hope he can continue to grace the screen with his supurb acting for years to come!
Released yesterday, it’s only the teaser trailer, but it looks really good. I like the darkening tone and somber mood, plus the actor playing the young Tom Riddle seems like a really good fit (I believe it is actually Ralph Fiennes’ nephew).
The HBP is one of my favorite books in the series (I like Four and Seven as well, though all seven play a necessary part of the story and are all entertaining). I’m hoping this film will be better than the last one. I wasn’t too much of a fan of the OOTP movie because they edited so much that as one who’s read the book, I had trouble seeing things connect properly — it was very disjointed and missed some important points they’ll have to explain later. Hopefully they’ll make this one better, more focused.
A major problem with having state-controlled health care as a “right” is that they can deny you access or care if your situation is not in the state’s economic best-interest. We’ll see loving ol’ grandmas and thirty something drunks fighting over access to livers — maybe grandma or the lush will die waiting for the operation, possibly making the government’s decision easier. We’ll see people being denied care for choices they made in life, like smoking, drugs or trans-fat laden fast-food (it’s already “banned” in California). And don’t forget those pesky staph infections!
Crazy?
Well, recently the State of Oregon offered 53-year-old Randy Stroup a simple solution to his prostate cancer: since Randy didn’t have health insurance and his prostate cancer treatment is very costly for state-run health care, he can opt into their unique assisted-suicide plan! The slippery slope of our culture’s devaluation of life continues.
Apparently, a number of op-ed articles have hit the Internet regarding Christopher Nolan’s new film, the box-office shattering The Dark Knight, and how Batman allegorically plays the role of George W. Bush (some say Batman is Dick Cheney or a generic conservative hero)!
A friend tipped me off to this concept last night and I looked around the Internet finding that this notion has been proliferating, even to the WSJ Online! It makes a lot of sense to see The Dark Knight as an allegory of the War on Terror and about Batman as the man who few people like as the one who has to make the hard choice to blur the lines in order to achieve victory — aka GWB to some.
Leftist blogs are wicked upset that a movie with such a black-and-white treatment of morality like this one can make $300 million in just ten days while their beloved anti-war flicks quickly sputter and die quick deaths! In The Dark Knight, terrorists (The Joker’s crew) are the remorseless fiends who fight for no discernible reason beyond the joy of it, and the good people have very tough choice to make on how to defeat them. It mirrors reality.
Given the box office success of this film, perhaps the American people still yearn for a no nonsense ass-kicker rather than an international ass-kisser in their leaders. This bodes well for McCain down the stretch, with less than 100 left until my birthday, which happens to be Election Day this year. But will people make this connection and understand its implications? Will the baggage of the last eight years show up on Election Day and turn American into an Obama Nation? Who knows? If the allegory holds however, then it’s the Republicans and Bush who must take the hit for having made hard, sometimes unpopular, choices which have nonetheless made all of us safer.
The latest piece from Times Online editor, American Gerard Baker, first came to my attention about an hour ago and it’s a doozy!
His latest op-ed is absolutely awesome. Baker takes the media’s open desire to make Barack Obama the Savior/Messiah and completely pokes fun at those who have this view (he also calls Gordon Brown, Gordon the Leper!) through colorful and biblical-style language. I don’t think the New Yorker crowd will misunderstand this satire, but one never knows. Here’s a sample from the beginning:
“And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.
The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.”
I wish Obama would have “ventured forth” to the wounded troops at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, but that would have seemed “too political.” The Pentagon simply told him not to bring his media and campaign troglodytes, but he could go as an elected official, rather than a candidate. He chose not to go. However, he made it to the gym though.
WARNING: No true spoilers, just a lot of “insider baseball” in regards to the fantasy genre.
Thus far, Christopher Nolan’s take on Frank Miller’s Batman: The Dark Knight Returns and Batman: Year Oneseries is leaps and bounds better than any of those goofy Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney movies, which all seemed too comic-like to be taken seriously. I never liked any of them because (this may sound strange) they seemed too much like I was watching a comic book movie.
But Batman Beginswas entirely different from my point of view — it had heart, an interesting and deliberately developing storyline, characters you care about, and great action which didn’t strain the “plausible impossible” too too much, as some of the earlier versions of Batman could (think of Batman jumping out of a missile with Robin after ducking Mr. Freeze’s trap before reengaging the chase after dropping six miles on sky-surfing blades without a scratch in Batman and Robin: a little ridiculous even for fantasy!).
Nolan continues the series about a year after Batman Begins.The Dark Knightlives up to and surpasses its predecessor in terms of action and an intricately weaved storyline that leaves you with a sense of real danger for our heroes. I’m not ready to say that this movie was the best thing ever, as some have said, but it’s the best movie I’ve seen this year by far. Heath Ledger’s Joker is worth the price of admission; he’s both more creepy and lucid than Jack Nicholson’s rendition back in 1989 — they aren’t even on the same planet. Oscar-worthy? They’d give one of those things to anybody these days, so the late Heath Ledger will probably get one just for having died (that’s not to say his performance wasn’t worth an award, he was great, but the Academy is mostly out of touch with their audience and the insiders will demand the award be given to him nonetheless… plus think of the viewership at next year’s Oscars).
Comic books are really just morality tales, including “graphic novels” (the 21st Century way of describing a “comic book”). So, in Batman Begins we are treated to a tale about how to conquer our fears and using our strengths to do and be better than what we think we’re capable of. My take is that The Dark Knight simply continues that theme with an extended lesson. The enemies in Batman Begins were sinister but had rules: Ra’s Al Ghul and his minions had a shrewd but ancient warrior code, the Mobsters had one’s basic code about not messing with the Big-Guy, and the Scarecrow functioned in the real world as a psychiatrist and crony and let go of those rules only when with the psychotic inmates or his victims. Ledger’s Joker has no rules. Give such recklessness, the question is: how far will the good people go to defeat such evil? The Dark Knight explores this concept from everyone’s point of view. We’re beyond fear in this movie – it’s what to do now that good people are afraid: ally with the evil for a temporary benefit, bend the rules to slow the evil down, or become like the evil thing itself. No one in Gotham City can come to grips with the Joker: even the Mob looks weak and impotent next to the Joker’s recklessness. Our heroes need to look inside to defeat this menace, and not everything there is peachy or easy. That’s what makes this movie stay true to the magic of the original — it’s not about the car crash, it’s about handling the ride.
I also love sagas when they introduce the insidious third party. Like The Matrix series had the Merovingian and his crew of tertiary programs floating between the world of men and the machines, The Dark Knight’s Joker is a tertiary interest between the Cops and the typical Bad Guys who, unlike the Merovingian, is not just floating — he’s destroying everything on both sides (like the viral Agent Smith in this The Matrix analogy)! He’s destroying it for its own sake, not for any common reason like power or favor which normal people could understand. Sometimes that’s the problem with evil — there isn’t any understanding it, no matter how hard we may try.
I give this movie a solid A+/A (like a 96%) for entertainment value, storyline, and morality. You should see it, especially if you liked the first one or want to forget about those ridiculous ones from the 1980s and 1990s.
Either way, this exchange broke out between the ladies, mostly Whoopi and Sherri versus Elisabeth, about the use of the “n-word.” As usual, they seemed to gang up on Elisabeth, although I believe she has the moral high-ground in this argument:
In my opinion, either it’s a good word or a bad word, but playing the “it’s our word” game is not only a complete violation of the First Amendment if use of the word leads to legal repercussions (which it does in certain circumstances, sometimes even when the word itself is not even used!), but it’s simply not playing fair. Also, adding an “a” or an “er” to the end of the word should make no difference if in principle it’s a bad word either.
Yet, it does make a difference, at least to my students, their music, and some in the media. Should it, though? Elisabeth says no, and based on principle I’m in solidarity with her on this one. I wonder what Jesse Jackson would have to say about all this?
The Belgian brewing company InBev is going to buy Anheuser-Busch for $52 million. While many details are still being negotiated, the deal will probably become reality. If that is the case then, in my opinion there are two different ways of looking at this:
1. This is a dark day for America. As the Belgians buy-out the largest beer producer in America, America is a weaker, sadder place… we can’t even brew and market our own storied/historic beer without help from those pesky Europeans! Selling our souls for $52 billion? Anheuser-Busch is a company which even survived Prohibition the honest way! I guess there is a price one could set for selling out to the Man – a Belgian man in this case.
2. Woo hoo! To this beer snob, Bud sucks (always has) and Belgian beers are world-renowned for their flavor and potency. So, even though under the new management Bud will still suck, in the eyes of the world we’ll get a little more international “street cred” when soliciting our crappy beer to others. InBev brews Stella Artois and Becks (meh) and Anheuser-Busch owns 50% of Corona. Ultimately, this could signal a marked improvement to the average beer Joe Sixpack consumes. Though this in no way will affect my own drinking habits, I believe this “sell-out” is an upgrade!
Well, the first part of that isn’t entirely true, but I did spend fifteen months writing a rather long historiographical thesis on Theodore Roosevelt back in college. In that work I used some of John McCain’s campaign rhetoric from early 2000 as evidence of TR’s increasing influence amongst politicians of both parties today (I also quoted from BJ’s 2000 State of the Union Address where he name-drops TR). Back in February 2000 McCain unsuccessfully tried to make himself out to be the heir of both TR and Ronald Reagan, and he’s trying it again in 2008.
We can laugh at McCain’s “Reaganesque” boasts as shallow and empty, but why’s he stuck on TR? Most people only know a few things about TR: trust-buster, Mt. Rushmore, those teeth, the “Teddy bear,” conservation. Like his Reagan comparison, McCain is being very selective with how he chooses to connect himself to TR:
TR’s domestic policies laid the philosophical foundation for modern “big-government” in his cousin’s New Deal two generations later — not very Reaganesque in my opinion.
TR was a “conservationist” not a “preservationist”, meaning that TR would have been OK with drilling in ANWAR since the footprint is so small (preservationists, on the other hand, want humans completely out of undeveloped areas). McCain’s still being difficult on that issue.
TR was described as a ”maverick” for bucking the era’s MSM by not fitting their typical Republican stereotype. Yet, TR understood politics, alienated some, but still had most of his party enthusiastic about him and mostly adhered to the party’s platform. No conservative is enthusiastic about McCain and McCain doesn’t seem to care – he’s more interested in growing the party 1970s-style by making it resemble the Democrats. Plus, TR’s being a “maverick” eventually led to a party split in 1912 which gave Wilson the presidency. Why should any self-respecting Republican embrace a maverick like that today? McCain’s obviously being selective here.
Instead of trying to get along with fractious immigrant groups, TR firmly believed and articulated that “hyphenated Americanism” is un-American and unpatriotic. McCain wants to coddle 12-15 million illegals and still hasn’t proposed making English the official language of government, a highly popular position with the general public.
However, TR had an unabashed pro-American foreign policy like Reagan. Maybe that’s an area where McCain’s rhetoric can get away with the comparison. But don’t be fooled! McCain does not have the clear vision of a Ronald Reagan, nor the vigor or political climate that made TR such an influential politician. We have a Ford, not a Lincoln; we have a McCain, not a Reagan.
Former White House Press Secretary, radio talk-show host, moderator of “Fox News Sunday,” and former speechwriter for Bush 41, Tony Snow finally succumbed to the colon cancer he had been battling for a few years now when he died at about 2am Saturday morning at Georgetown University Hospital. Although they had removed his colon a few years ago, the cancer nonetheless spread to his liver last year. He leaves behind a wife, three children and many friends and admirers.
I’d been watching Tony Snow ever since my local cable finally carried Fox News back in 2000. It was kind of awkward watching Chris Wallace take over for him as the moderator of “Fox News Sunday” a few years later. Also, I remember Tony Snow filling for Rush once in a while when I was in college (Sean Hannity would also fill in from time to time, which happened to be my first exposure to both Hannity and Snow — thanks Rush for recognizing talent!). As Press Secretary, it was so refreshing to see Snow strike back at the MSM who was unsuccessfully trying desperately to embarrass him and the White House like they did so effectively to Scott McClellan.
Like Tim Russert, this death is a huge loss to the media and culture as both were taken from us with so much potential left to be realized.
One thing that bothers me even more than wasteful government programs is the way government often wastes money advertising wasteful government programs. Actually, what really bothers me is being caught off guard by a photo of an oversized vomiting sea cow. Thankfully this masterpiece advertising the fact that government will clean up your puddle of yack was funded by our British friends’ hard earned tax funds and not ours. Small comfort to those of us who, um, enjoyed that photo for free.
On a lighter note, if there is any truth to what was implied by today’s rumor, then this hag would be one heck of a step up for Alex Rodriguez.
While perusing the Corner earlier today, I was pleased to see that All American Colleges has published a guide for the top 50 schools for conservatives, old-fashioned liberals, and people of faith. I was even more pleased with the cover. I know many of you will agree.
“With skyrocketing gas prices, it is clear that the American people can no longer afford the Republican rubber-stamp Congress and its failure to stand up to the Republican big oil and gas company cronies….
“Democrats have a common-sense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas prices by cracking down on price gouging, rolling back the billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies, tax breaks and royalty relief given to big oil and gas companies, and increasing production of alternative fuels.”
That was when gas was at $2.91 a gallon. Well, gas is currently at $4.08 just 18 months into the Democrat control of Congress. There are many reasons why gas is high, the price of oil being one reason, but in the world of American politics, one takes credit when times are good, but also gets blamed when times are bad.
So, where are the Republicans hammering the Dems on this broken campaign pledge? Not only do Republicans have a definite edge on the drilling solution, but using the Dems own words against them would help to unify the RNC’s voice nationally on this issue: “Can we afford another Democrat Congress?” and so forth. The press isn’t going to call the Dems out on this issue so we have to do it — this is finally an issue that the Republicans poll better than Dems this year!
Obama can throw his “typical white” racist grandma under the bus and the LA Times calls it his Abraham Lincoln moment. That’s OK. It’s being frank about race, but the microscope surrounding Don Imus has unearthed another controversial racial comment that is resulting in a new round of haranguing against the popular radio shock-jock.
However, Imus has to know that there are some out there looking for any gaffe of slip-up so they can take Imus down for good and keep racial issues in the headlines during this election year.
A new antenatal test currently in trial stages can indicate whether or not a couple is going to have a child with Down’s Syndrome at about the seventh week of gestation. Some believe this would definitely lead to increased abortions of those children.
We’re beginning to enter that world we all talked about 10-15 years ago when we asked ”what if” science could find out things like this for the benefit of new parents before the child is born, or even change characteristics to create cafe-style children looking like we want them to, etc. We’re not at the latter point yet, but probably will be within our lifetime.
Yet, in this particular scenario (and most other ones of this nature) the child gets left behind. It’s Down’s today, but what if tomorrow it is homosexuality or susceptiblility to multiple sclerosis or even (to some vein parents) an unwanted recessive eye color? Isn’t this what the Nazis tried to do — weed out the weak in society for the strength and convenience of the living?
Yet, shouldn’t the parents know everything they can about the health of their child before he or she is born? It’s a potentially slippery slope when we start gauging the value of a child before he or she has a chance to be born if that means terminating those who are deemed weak or inconvenient after a couple initially had the intent to keep the child.
I was once in a college band and know the controversies which arise from bands in the same genre swiping this or that lick or riff from other bands. My band was innocent of that stuff because we weren’t trying to be too contemporary (we sounded like Tool meets Rush when at the time everyone wanted to sound like 311), but many bands in the area which had a very similar sound always used to complain about this band or that band stealing their music. It was very tough to watch sometimes.
In truth, copyrighted material like a song must be intentionally lifted and the notes/arrangement must be nearly identical to have a case in court, otherwise Paul and Ringo have quite a case against Oasis. VanillaIce’s swipe of “Under Pressure” was a sampling he gave credit to but also took without permission, hence legal issues arose. I think the Creaky Boards song and the Coldplay tune are somewhat similar, but CreakyBoards doesn’t have a case in my opinion since they two songs have different arrangements and lyrics. They are somewhat similar, but not the same.
Hats off to Creaky Boards, though! This is a great way to get one’s band in the news– all publicity is good publicity in music and the arts when one’s trying to break through.
Tonight, the Boston Celtics defeated the Detroit Pistons 89-81 in Game Six of the NBA’s Eastern Conference Championship game. The Celts will now play for the NBA Championship for the first time in 21 years (that was 1987 for those of you with a public school education). The kicker is who they are playing: the Los Angeles Lakers!
Whoa… I can’t believe it! Where am I? Or more importantly, when am I?
If there ever was a classic NBA match-up to bring many old fans back, this is it. I count myself in that category. The NBA has been very unexciting to me since Michael Jordan finally retired. I was mainly rooting against the Chicago Bulls back then, but Jordan was something special to watch and the Celts weren’t very good. Just last year the Celts only won 24 games (this year they had a league-leading 66 wins!).
In fact, Boston fans haven’t had much reason to cheer for the Celtics over most of the last two decades because they have pretty much have stunk. Hence, my interest in pro-basketball has waned considerably, replaced by a renewed interest in Big East College Basketball instead (Go Friars!). However, a chance to see the Celts play their storied rival, the LA Lakers for the NBA Championship next week is just plain awesome! I’ll watch every game and bask in all the history the commentators will relish in!
That’s just what a Santa Fe group wants: the ban of WiFi service in public facilities like the library, city hall, and eventually stores. They claim that since some people have real allergies to certain electrical fields (”electro-smog”), like those emitted by WiFi and cellphones, keeping WiFi in public areas risks discrimination in a way that violates of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
I empathize for those people with those allergies, but I have WiFi and I love it, like my cellphone. Should I get permission to stay home from work everyday there’s tree pollen in the spring, which I happen to have some allergies toward? I know that trees can’t help it, but my boss can! Is he discriminating against me because I have to work while sneezing, rubbing watery eyes, and teaching through a hoarse voice?
No. I have to cope, take allergy meds on the bad days, suck it up, and continue to be a cog in the wheels of American capitalism. These folks should be targeting doctors to find meds and cures which allow them to take part in life, not minimize life for everyone else, claiming discrimination. Do these folks work for the Obama campaign? They’d fit right in.
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008 ) was a damn great flick, following in the serious, yet sometimes tongue-in-cheek, pulp action of the originals! It was full of fun and outrageous death-defying action sequences, mystical plot twists, and of course the commies are the bad guys this time!
In fact, the Russian Communist Party is not too happy about the movie’s portrayal of Soviet Communists in 1957. Note to Comrade: get over it — your predecessors were well-documented monsters and we know you aren’t anymore! Marxist-Communism as a way of life has been exposed as a failure currently rotting on the ash heap of history. The movie simply elaborates on already existing stereotypes of Soviets in the post-Stalin/pre-Sputnik period.
Back to the flick. I enjoyed the fun and quickly accepted the unusual premise they through at us. If you didn’t, the tone of this overview will not match yours. Indiana Jones still rocks as an older professor. I really enjoyed seeing Indy back in action. George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have earned every dollar that their film makes this and in subsequent weekends.
So, I don’t want to say anymore because there are things about this film that can be spoiled. In short, I haven’t been this satisfied with a movie in a long time. Both nostalgia and the film’s sense of fun (plus I love seeing commies as the bad-guys; the Nazis were getting old in these films) have earned an unabashed A for this film in my opinion. If you have other thoughts after seeing the flick, comment using as many spoilers as you want– there is much to discuss.
Official movie picture printed in the Boston Globe.
Doctors have identified “a malignant glioma in the left parietal lobe” as the cause of Senator Kennedy’s seizure over the weekend. This kind of cancer affects roughly 9000 Americans per year and early diagnosis and a non-aggressive type can lead to about five more years.
But it’ll be a tough slog. Kennedy’s cancer is inoperable and will require chemo and other harsh treatments. To reiterate a previous post: despite our political beliefs, we here nonetheless hope that Kennedy can recover, even though the prognosis is very dark.
I just got back from viewing The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspianat a new movie-viewing location near my new place. So, let me get right to it without ruining the plot for those who haven’t seen it:
I like C.S. Lewis, for both his fantasy novels and his philosophical works. Part 1 (or Book 2 if you’re a purist) The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobewas a good movie adaptation because it effectively used tons of religious allegory to tell a mythical coming of age story about four kids sent up North during the Blitz of 1940 who stumbled into a mysterious land. It was full of mystery and wonder and brought us into a new world in which the “Sons of Adam” and “Daughters of Eve” were delivered in order to make things right.
Prince Caspian does a similar kind of thing, but in my opinion with much less allegory and heart. There were moments of struggle, choice, doubt, belief and introspection, but much of the wonder was gone, replaced by more battle scenes with little depth. I liked the increased action, and on the surface it was a better movie than the first one, yet something was missing. I read LWW, but never read Prince Caspian (which is technically Book Four of the series), so I’m not sure how it translated to film. I just had the sense that some of the magic in the first movie was not here. Maybe I needed more of an explanation, maybe I needed more Aslan, maybe I needed more back-story, but something’s leaving me unsatisfied.
I’d give the movie a “B.” Great action, good story, but it left me wanting more — not in a good “I can’t wait for the sequel” kind of way, but rather a “Did I miss something?” sort of way. I’m going to have to read the book now.
Whereas sometimes we at AOR like to poke fun at Ted Kennedy, in times like this it is not appropriate. He’s human, and we are not just fallible beings, we’re mortal beings who must deal with what life hands us sometimes.
It’s reported at this early hour that the 76-year-old Kennedy was hospitalized with symptoms of a stroke. We hope he gets better and continues to engage the Right on the issues when this is over. We may not agree with his politics, but during this episode he’s a fellow human being, not a political dartboard.
Oscar Pistorius, a man who needed part of his legs amputated as a young child, has been cleared by the IAAF to compete in the Beijing Olympics. This point is controversial because some believe that his prosthetic limbs could indicate an unfair advantage against non-bionic opponents, and the “Paralympics” is an existing competitive body for those like Pistorius.
I’ll be honest: I’d love to see this guy compete out of curiosity. Prosthetic technology has innovated leaps and bounds (no pun intended) over the last decade. What if Oscar defeats his opponents by a wide margin? Will fairness be an issue? Will some crazy competitive psycho lop his own legs off to gain a competitive advantage, if an advantage is shown to exist, for the 2012 games? Um… probably not, but Oscar will get the chance to shine (or at least compete) in Beijing.
I’m feeling a little vindictive right now. Since this song has been stuck in my head for about two and a half days now, I think you need to hear it too.
I just moved into a better, swankier place so I was AWOL for a while. My Internet was messed up and my new and exciting digital cable was all pixelated and unclear until about thirty minutes ago. But now all is well.
Thank God I teach a non-controversial subject History/Social Studies to high school kids, otherwise I’d have to tackle really tough issues like evolution…
Oh wait a minute, Charles Darwin and the Scopes Trial are both in my curriculum! Uh oh!
Anyway, in the latest round of the evolution debate as it relates to the Culture War in schools there is an effort by Michigan and Florida legislators to avoid the illegal realm of ”creationism” and “intelligent design,” by simply encouraging teachers to ”cast doubt” on the theory of evolution in class discussion.
You mean, actually encourage critical thinking in our students? Egads! I know this will bother some as backdoor intelligent design, but get a grip! If evolution is so settled in science, then why not let it stand up to intellectual competition amongst secondary school kids?
You know my opinion: I think evolution happens, but Darwinism is kooky. I think separating Darwin from other evolution theories (scientific or not) is helpful in exposing our kids to a broader view of science and possibility.